• Aucun résultat trouvé

Evolution of the ILC Project &

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Evolution of the ILC Project &"

Copied!
18
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Maxim Titov, CEA Saclay, Irfu, France

Evolution of the ILC Project &

International Development Team

(2)

Linear colliders: ILC, CLIC (technical extendability to TeV regime)

Circular colliders: CEPC, FCC-ee

Compact Linear Collider (CLIC):

CERN√s = 380 GeV, 1.5 TeV, 3 TeV Length: 11 km, 29 km, 50 km International Linear Collider (ILC):

Japan (Kitakami)

√s = 250 - 500 GeV, 1 TeV

Length: 21 km -31 km (50 km)

Circular Electron-Positron Collider(CEPC):

China

√s = 90 - 240 GeV

Circumference: 100 km

Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee):

CERN√s = 90 - 350 GeV

Circumference: ~100 km arXiv: 1901.09829

arXiv: 1901.09825

arXiv: 1812.07987 arXiv: 1812.07986

arXiv: 1901.03169 arXiv: 1901.03170

http://fcc-cdr.web.cern.ch/

Future Electron-Positron Colliders: “ Higgs Factory”

(3)

Higgs is so simple and so unnatural

a ”malicious choice”

!

M

H

TODAY:

consistency so-far with the SM-like

Higgs Boson

FUTURE:

20x increase in statistics

Measurements of Higgs properties with increasing precision are a formidable tool to look for new-physics manifestations

experimental precision approaching theory precision even before using full Run 2 statistics

arXiv: 1902.00134

From Discovery to Precision: THE Higgs or A Higgs

(4)

Higgs Couplings Precision with ILC

Model-Independent EFT Fit (22-parameters)

 ~ 1 % or better reached for many couplings  adding 500 GeV improves up to a factor of ~2

 ILC(250 GeV) offers quantitative and qualitative improvement beyond information accessible at hadron colliders  much better sensitivity to BSM !

Highly model-independent analysis of EFT:

Phys Rev D97, 053003 (2018)

Precision on Higgs Couplings and Synergy with HL-LHC:

~1 % required to access New Physics beyond HL-LHC

direct search

(5)

Precision has always been a window to new discoveries Different BSM models predict different deviation patterns

=> Help discriminate between different Higgs models based on new physics possibilities beyond SM

Deviations Patterns to Reveal New Physics via Nature of Higgs

The ILC250 has the capability to tell the nature of

the BSM from its deviation pattern!

(6)

250 GeV International Linear Collider Overview

(7)

e+e- centre-of-mass energy:

first stage: 250 GeV (20 km tunnel)

tunable; upgrades: 500 GeV, 1 TeV

Other options: running at Z pole

& WW threshold

Luminosity:

Initial design L ~ 1.35 x 1034 /cm2/s (400 fb-1 during the first 4 years)

Upgrade 2.7 x 1034 /cm2 /s (doubling number of bunches per pulse – moderate cost (~10%));

Upgrade 5.4 x 1034 /cm2 /s (repetiton rate 5 10 Hz (expensive));

Beam polarisation

• P(e-) ≥ ±80%

• P(e+) = ±30%, at 500 GeV upgradable to 60%

Possible running scenario:

The International Linear Collider in a Nutshell

(8)

ILC Site Candidate Location in Japan: Kitakami Area

Oshu

Ichinoseki

Ofunato

Kesen-numa Sendai

Express- Rail High-way

Proposed by JHEP community Endorsed by LCC

Establish a site-specific Civil Engineering Design - map the (site independent) TDR baseline onto the preferred site - assuming “Kitakami” as a primary candidate

Need to finalize:

- IP / Linac orientation and length - Access points and IR infrastructure - Conventional Facilities and Siting (CFS)

IP Region

Earthquake-proof stable bedrock of granite.

No faults cross the line

(9)

Two Validated Detector Concepts: ILD and SiD

ILD_L / ILD_S SiD

Both optimized for PFA Performance: ~ BRECAL,inner2 (two-track separation @ ECAL)

B = 3.5 T / 4 T B = 5 T

RECAL,inner = 1.8 / 1.46 m RECAL,inner = 1.27 m

Si + TPC tracking

Outer radius: 1.77 / 1.43 m Silicon Tracking only Outer radius: 1.22 m Re-optimisation: Large (L) & small (S) options

ILD Interim Design Report:

arXiv: 2003.01116

ILD-L ILD-S

Reduced tracker radius, length unchanged

(10)

ILD vs SiD: Two Tracking Complementary Approaches

Gaseous Tracking (ILD): Silicon Tracking (SiD):

Si + Gaseous Tracking System:

- VXD: long barrel of 3 double layers

- Intermediate Si-tracker (SIT, SET, FTD) SIT/FTD: silicon pixel sensors (e.g. CMOS) SET: silicon strip sensors

- Time Projection Chamber with MPGD-readout High hit redundancy (200 hits / track)

3D tracking / pattern recognition;

dE/dx information for PID

All Si-Tracking (concept proven by CMS) - VXD: short barrel of 5 single layers

- 5 layers Silicon-strip tracker

(25um strips, 50 um readout pitch) - Few highly precise hits (max. 12)

- Robustness, single bunch time stamping

Vertex detector Strip detector

(11)

Collaborations CLICPix

FPCCD

TPAC

LCTPC

DEPFET SOI ChronoPixel

CMOS MAPS GEM DHCAL

RPC DHCAL Scintillator ECAL

Silicon ECAL (SiD)

Silicon ECAL

(ILD) Dual Readout

Scintillator HCAL

RPC Muon

VIP KPIX

FCAL

SDHCAL

Many forms of Linear

Collider Detector R&D efforts:

 Large collaborations: CALICE, LCTPC, FCAL

 Collection of many efforts such as vertex R&Ds

 Individual group R&D activities

 Efforts currently not directly included in the concept groups (ILD, SiD, CLICdp), which may become important for LC in future

(12)

Collaborations CLICPix

FPCCD

TPAC

LCTPC

DEPFET SOI ChronoPixel

CMOS MAPS GEM DHCAL

RPC DHCAL Scintillator ECAL

Silicon ECAL (SiD)

Silicon ECAL

(ILD) Dual Readout

Scintillator HCAL

RPC Muon

VIP KPIX

FCAL

SDHCAL

Many forms of Linear

Collider Detector R&D efforts:

 Large collaborations: CALICE, LCTPC, FCAL

 Collection of many efforts such as vertex R&Ds

 Individual group R&D activities

 Efforts currently not directly included in the concept groups (ILD, SiD, CLICdp), which may become important for LC in future

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3749461 (DOI:10.5281/zenodo.3749461)

(13)

Final agreement among governments on construction

Full-scale negotiation among governments – specify conditions and processes Multi-lateral

Discussion

Government Level

2019Mar 2027

Strengthen US-Japan Discussion Group:

cost reduction R&D, governance discussion Discussion among governments

Exchange of information

Researchers Level

ICFA/LCB

@Tokyo

Pre-lab

2022 – 2026 [4 years]

ICFA: international organization of researchers consisting of directors of world’s major accelerator labs and representatives of researchers

ILC pre-lab: International research organization for the preparation of ILC based on agreements among world’s major accelerator labs such as KEK, CERN, FNAL, DESY, etc.

7-Mar-2019 MEXTpanel

Summarize opinions of relevant ministries

European Particle Physics Strategy Update (EPPSU)

EPPSU adopted by CERN Council

Agreement on governance, operation, sharing of cost and human resources

KEK International WG

Construction

2026 – 2035 [9 years]

Negotiations on international sharing [2019 fall–]

ICFA/LCB

@SLAC 20-Feb-2020

19-Jun-2020 Statement

by Japan Statement

by Japan

Transition

Phase Preparation Phase Construction7Phase

2021 2022 2023 2026

May 2019 – Oct 2019 2020Feb

Discussion Group with European partners:

[JP/DE: Jul 2019–] [JP/DE/FR/UK: Feb 2020–]

Good enough design for the final approval of construction, resolution of remaining technical issues SCJ Master Plan

Jan 2020

Input from US

International

Development Team

Aug 2020 – 2022 (2 years)

Collaboration of research labs Prepare for Pre-lab

and Accelerator/

Detector/Physics

Basic idea of international sharing of human and material resources

Processes and Approximate Timelines Towards Realization of ILC

(14)

Establish a preliminary list of the ILC Pre-lab tasks and deliverables (through WG2) and national/regional laboratories which might be interested in contributing to those;

Establish Pre-lab resources needs for the regional activities and central office (a few % of ILC cost);

Prepare a preliminary proposal for the ILC Pre-lab organization and governance:

Finalise all the inputs needed to set-up the Pre-lab;

International Development Team (IDT) Goals for 2021-2022

https://linearcollider.org/

arXiv: 2106.00602

(15)

IDT - WG1: Approximate Timeline of the ILC Realisation

ILC Pre-laboratory (~4 years)

- Complete all the technical preparation necessary to start the ILC project (infrastructure, environmental impact and accelerator facility) :

- Prepare scenarios for the regional contributions to and organisation for the ILC;

ILC laboratory

- Construction and commissioning of the ILC (~9-10 years);

- Followed by the operationof the ILC;

- Managing the scientific programme of the ILC;

ILC IDT (~2 years):

- Prepare the work and deliverables of the ILC Pre-laboratory and work out, with national and regional laboratories, a scenario for their contributions;

- Prepare a proposal for the organisation and governance of the ILC Pre-

laboratory;

Positive “signs” from the host country (Japan) government and agreements by the national/regional laboratories for providing

their contributions

Positive « outcomes « of the inter-governmental negotiations for the responsibility and cost sharing among the host (Japan) and partner countries

Set up four WG1 subgroups:

i. Pre-Lab organization

ii. Preferred legal base for the Pre-Lab iii. Necessary condition to start the Pre-Lab iv. Process to start the Pre-Lab

(16)

IDT – WG2: Technical Preparation Document

IDT-WG2 summarized the technical preparation as Work Packages (WPs) for the Pre-Lab stage in the Technical preparation Document

(17)

ILC - WG3: Physics and Detectors Timeline

 Oct. 25-29, 2021: ILC Workshop on Potential Experiments (ILCX2021)

 2022-2023: The IDT calls for EoIs, to be presented in a workshop after Pre-lab start

 2022-2023: Potential start of the Pre-lab. EoI presentations in dedicated workshop. The process of moving from EoI presentations towards LoI documents is community driven.

Initial dedicated ILC R&D funds will be needed.

2023: LoI submissions and presentations. The ILCXAC will initiate its evaluation of the LoIs. R&D continues.

2024: ILCXAC recommendations of initial ILC experiments to proceed towards TPs.

R&D towards the TPs.

2025: TP submissions and presentations. Continuation of R&D and recommendations by the ILCXAC based on the submit-ted TPs.

2026-27: Approval of the experiments, based on the TP and ILCXAC recommendations, by a committee set up by the ILC Laboratory. Recommendations to proceed towards

Technical Design (TDR) Reports. Funding requests for construction are being prepared.

2027: The ILC laboratory allows construction to start and construction funding spending for experiments or experimental subsystems based on TDRs approvals.

(18)

“ILC as a Global Project”

international project, led by Japanese initiative

Important conditions for ILC realization:

 Reach common understanding of the ILC Laboratory (“a-la CERN-II’) and model of cost-sharing between Japan (and Asia), US and Europe

 Global Context  ILC has to be Coexisting and Synergistic with CERN

 Create a Basis for International Cooperation in the Industrial Sector

Tentative timeline for the ILC Project:

 Today, ILC is technically sound and is the only mature technology for future accelerator, ready for construction start

 Staged ILC offers excellent science from first stage (250 GeV)  higher energy

upgrades will extend physics program  All LHC scenarios leave a compelling ILC

discovery potential

Références

Documents relatifs